Rtx 2060 Compared To Gtx 1080
When Nvidia announced their RTX twenty-Series GPUs, information technology was idea that the GTX series was being replaced. With advanced architecture and specialized RT and Tensor cores, it was assumed the RTX newcomers would outperform GTX in every conceivable style, but the 1080, Nvidia's flagship GTX GPU, isn't going easy.
Through benchmark testing, information technology's already been established that the GTX 1080 released in 2016 still offers a much higher performance for gaming than the best the 2019 16-Series GPUs have to offering, but then it got gamers thinking. If the original GTX rex is destroying newer GTX units, how would information technology fare against the entry-level RTX GPU?
Well, we've done the research and put in the work, comparing these two fantastic GPUs in a number of categories, and nosotros have the respond for y'all!
ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080
MSI GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 6GB
Architecture
The fundamental crevice between these 2 GPUs is their architecture. The GTX series were all designed using Pascal microarchitecture, simply the new RTX line has state of the art Turing microarchitecture. Generally speaking, Turing architecture is much more than impressive. By allowing an independent integer information path to collaborate on command execution with the floating-signal datapath – teamwork that was blocked in Pascal – each CUDA core can evangelize twice the functioning of Pascal cores. Withal, let's examine the details of each GPU'southward compages more precisely.
Built with GP104-400-A1 variant of Pascal microarchitecture, the 1080 has a gargantuan total of 7.two billion transistors spread beyond 2560 CUDA cores and features 2560 shading units, 160 textural units, and 64 rendering units. It supports PCI-e 3 and DirectX 12, and has a base of operations clock speed of 1607MHz and additional rate of 1733MHz
The RTX 2060 is a product of TU106-200A-KA-A1 Turing microarchitecture, which is the nigh basic Turing format besides the ones found in GTX 16-Serial GPUs. It encompasses 10.eight billion transistors across a notable fewer 1920 CUDA cores, but retrieve, they're twice every bit productive equally Pascal cores. What'south more than, it boasts a smaller 12nm procedure size, 1920 shading units, 120 textural units, 48 rendering units, and also supports PCI-e iii and DirectX 12. It's base clock peaks at 1365 but boosts to 1680MHz
And so at this juncture, information technology'south difficult to tell which GPU will perform better. The GTX card has brawny architecture specs just outdated tech. The RTX bill of fare has the more than pocket-sized numbers overall, but information technology's more advanced. The 1080 has some pumped clock speeds, merely we should also pay shut attention to the 2060's significant boost in transistors, as more than transistors typically amount to more efficient operation.
Cooling
While the GTX 1080 may take a higher thermal capacity, maxing out at 94°C, information technology besides, runs much hotter than the energy-efficient RTX 2060 GPU. There'due south not much betwixt them in terms of power suck. The GTX pulls 180 watts to the RTX's 160 watts. That's nothing compared to some AMD GPUs that pulls well over the 200-watt mark, but because the 1080 is a blower and decidedly older, it's bound to run hotter.
The 1080 commonly reaches beyond 80°C during gaming, but we wouldn't recommend an aftermarket cooling system unless you're sticking with it for the foreseeable future, or perhaps you're going to be pushing it to its limits 24-hour interval in day out. In that instance, it might be worth equipping some liquid.
The RTX 2060 is an open-air GPU that is great for keeping its local temperature fashion below capacity with bolstered CFM airflow, but it relies on your example's frazzle organization to exorcise that devilish estrus birthday. So, you don't need any aftermarket cooling for the 2060 itself, just you may want to broaden your case's general exhaust matrix to protect your other hardware.
Dimensions
In regards to die size, the 1080 is a niggling smaller. The Pascal architecture is built on a 314mm2 foundation. The 2060'southward foundation measures in at 445mm2.
In terms of overall size, however, the RTX GPU is a bear on smaller, measuring 4.435" (H) x nine" (L) ten ii-slot (Due west), as opposed to the GTX 1080'due south dimensions of 4.376" (H) x 10.5" (L) x 2-slot (W). So, as yous can run into, the 2060 is but a fraction of bigger in terms of height, just a whole inch and a half shorter in length.
These minute differences may be fairly negligible for most gamers, simply to those of you who pride yourself on your diminutive setups, the RTX will probably have a larger appeal.
Resolutions and Frames Per Second
It's difficult to say which of these cards performs improve from specs solitary. It's all theoretical conjecture until you bring it downward to brass tax do some real world comparative gaming, and then without farther ado…
1080
1080 is the GTX card's bread and butter. Don't get united states wrong, both cards perform uncommonly well at this resolution, achieving boilerplate frame rates far beyond the 200 mark in Counter Strike: Global Offensive, only you'd be hard pressed to detect a title that the 1080 doesn't clean up on. Tested on over 50 games, the GTX 1080 came out with a slim 2% victory.
1440p
1440p brings their average frame rates way beneath the 100fps marker, but even though both of their performances drops, the GTX 1080 steals an fifty-fifty larger win with vi% higher boilerplate frame rates. Overall the RTX mustered an average of 76.9fps, while the 1080 gnaw pulled an boilerplate of 81.3fps.
4K
Both cards really start to struggle at 4K, falling beneath the 50fps threshold, but the 1080 continues to boss, and in fact, with a seven% win, finishes proportionally stronger than in whatever other resolution.
Ray Tracing
The 1080 may take won the quick describe, claiming all three resolutions and most games with raw frames per 2d speed, only graphics quality is a slightly different loonshit, one in which the RTX 2060 has a huge advantage.
Turing architecture bestowed ray tracing capabilities upon the 2060 thanks to dedicated RT cores. Not every game supports ray tracing, but for the ones that do, the 2060 will provide hyper-realistic lite-based graphics.
At that place is an Nvidia driver that allows you to relish this enhanced global illumination on GTX cards too, but you tin can await their general performance to crumple under the workload.
VRAM
These Gpus have starkly contrasting memory configurations. The 1080 features an 8GB GDDR5X retentiveness with a 256-bit bus interface and 320GBps bandwidth. The 2060 rolls with just 6GB of GDDR6 retentiveness with a 192-bit bus interface, and 336GBps bandwidth.
The biggest difference betwixt these memory types other than that GDDR6 is designed for compatibility with stacked chip GPUs is that GDDR6 is much more energy efficient, but the way that Turing architecture structures memory functionality changes everything.
The 2060 may have smaller memory capacity, only different the private retention caches of Pascal compages, the SM retention path conglomerates texture caching, shared memory, and retentivity load caching into a unmarried unit of measurement. This amounts to wider bandwidth, an unburdened L1 cache, and 14GBps retention speed compared to the Pascal-hearted 1080'due south 10GBps
ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080
MSI GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 6GB
Verdict
It's a shocking and illuminating upshot. The 1080 is practically geriatric in tech-years, simply continues to brush newer more than expensive GPUs off similar they're nothing at all. With higher average frame rates, and an always widening percentage gap with each crash-land in resolution, the GTX 1080 is a smoother GPU and a great option for affordable competitive gaming. But non anybody is interested in milking as many fps as graphically possible…
Fifty-fifty if the GTX 1080 is still fighting the good fight, and is technically faster than this RTX unit, because of Turing's ray tracing and Tensor cores, for titles that support them, the 2060 is going to offer a much more realistic and impressive graphical operation.
Source: https://www.wepc.com/compare/gtx-1080-vs-rtx-2060/

0 Response to "Rtx 2060 Compared To Gtx 1080"
Post a Comment